An Empirical Study on Urban Income Disparities in the Greater Bay Area: Evidence from Convergence and Stability Tests
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v8n1.03Keywords:
Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, Income convergence, σ convergence, Unit root test, Regional coordinationAbstract
This paper examines the evolutionary trend of income disparity and its influencing factors in 11 cities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Specifically, the study focuses on whether the regional income gap shows a converging trend and explores the impact of policy synergy, industrial upgrading and population mobility on convergence. By conducting the σ-convergence test and ADF unit root test on the panel data for the period of 2004-2024, the results show that the overall trend of income disparity among cities in the Greater Bay Area has been converging, and the convergence is more significant especially after considering the population weighting. The results of the ADF test show that the economic growth series of most cities are smooth, indicating a convergence of growth paths within the region. The study concludes that policy synergy, industrial upgrading and population mobility play a key role in promoting income gap convergence. Based on this, this paper suggests that the financial mechanism and industrial transfer system should be further improved to promote coordinated regional development, and the analysis of β-convergence and spatial effects should be strengthened in the future to deeply understand the regional convergence mechanism."
Downloads
References
[1] Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. *Journal of Political Economy, 100*(2), 223–251.
[2] Chen, S. (2015). Literature review on the dynamic mechanisms of economic convergence. Social Sciences Frontier, 4*(1), 19–25.
[3] Eckey, H.-F., & Türck, M. (2005). Convergence of EU-regions: A literature report. *Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge*, No. 80, Universität Kassel.
[4] Helsley, R. W., & Strange, W. C. (2014). Coagglomeration, clusters, and the scale and composition of cities. *Journal of Political Economy, 122*(5), 1064–1093.
[5] Huang, X., Guo, R., Wang, W., Li, X., & Fan, Y. (2024). Research on the spatial disparities and convergence of Guangdong’s urban economy based on industrial agglomeration and industrial proximity. *Land, 13*, 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13010073
[6] Lee, B.-S., Peng, J., Li, G., & He, J. (2012). Regional economic disparity, financial disparity, and national economic growth: Evidence from China. *Review of Development Economics, 16*(2), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2012.00666.x
[7] McKinnon, R. (1973). *Money and capital in economic development*. Brookings Institution Press.
[8] Nagaraj, R., Varoudakis, A., & Veganzones, M. A. (2000). Long-run growth trends and convergence across Indian states. *Journal of International Development, 12*(1), 45–70.
[9] Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. *The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70*(1), 65–94.
[10] Williamson, J. G. (1965). Regional inequality and the process of national development. *Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13*(4), 3–45.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Global Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






