New Trends in Corporate Social Responsibility Practice under the Background of Globalization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v9n3.03Keywords:
Globalization, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), ESG system, Supply Chain Responsibility, Digital Empowerment, Cross border CollaborationAbstract
In the context of the deep integration of economic globalization and sustainable development, the practice of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has broken through the traditional public welfare category and become the core competitiveness of enterprise globalization. This article analyzes the five new trends of CSR under globalization based on international rule changes and corporate practices: the ESG system has shifted from voluntary initiatives to hard constraints, supply chain responsibility has extended to the entire chain, digital technology empowers responsibility management, local demand and global standards are coordinated and adapted, and cross-border entities jointly build a sustainable ecosystem. Research combines Lenovo Group's ESG system construction, BYD's supply chain carbon management, and State Grid's blockchain traceability to verify the positive correlation between CSR practices and long-term performance of enterprises. The results indicate that contemporary CSR has shifted from "passive compliance" to "active value creation", with standardization, intelligence, and collaboration becoming core features. This article provides a feasible responsibility path for global enterprises, helping them balance economic interests and social value to achieve high-quality development, while also providing practical references for the global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) at the enterprise level. The data and cases are sourced from international organization reports, public documents of enterprises, and authoritative media to ensure authenticity and traceability.
Downloads
References
[1] Lund‐Thomsen P, Nadvi K. Global value chains, local collective action and corporate social responsibility: a review of empirical evidence [J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2010, 19(1): 1-13.
[2] Solimene S, Coluccia D, Fontana S, et al. Formal Institutions and Voluntary CSR/ESG Disclosure: The Role of Institutional Diversity and Firm Size [J]. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2025.
[3] Jastram S M, Klingenberg J. Assessing the outcome effectiveness of multi-stakeholder initiatives in the field of corporate social responsibility–the example of the United Nations Global Compact [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 189: 775-784.
[4] Atanasov A, Chipriyanova G, Krasteva-Hristova R. Integration of digital technologies in corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis [J]. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 2023, 16(8): 373.
[5] Thorlakson T, De Zegher J F, Lambin E F. Companies’ contribution to sustainability through global supply chains [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, 115(9): 2072-2077.
[6] Singh A P, Rahman Z. Integrating corporate sustainability and sustainable development goals: towards a multi-stakeholder framework [J]. Cogent Business & Management, 2021, 8(1): 1985686.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Global Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






