Public Participation-Based Environmental Regulation and Urban Green Innovation: Evidence from Chinese City-Level Panel Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n3.10Keywords:
Public participation, Environmental regulation, Green innovation, Environmental governance, Chinese citiesAbstract
This study examines whether public participation-based environmental regulation promotes urban green innovation in China. Using a city-level panel of 2,488 observations for 2013–2021, the paper estimates two-way fixed-effects and dynamic specifications in which green innovation is measured by ln (green patent grants + 1) and the core explanatory variable is the one- to three-year lagged average of the logged public-participation indicator. The preferred dynamic model yields a positive and statistically significant coefficient of 0.1083, suggesting that stronger public participation is associated with higher green patent output after controlling for city effects, year effects, and innovation persistence. Mechanism tests indicate that the environmental-governance channel is better supported than the government-response channel. The positive association is also stronger in cities with higher openness and larger environmental expenditure shares. Overall, the evidence suggests that public participation can complement formal environmental governance by strengthening monitoring and improving the credibility of green upgrading, although the identification remains observational rather than quasi-experimental.
Downloads
References
[1] Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.
[2] Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R., & Stavins, R. N. (1995). Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 132–163.
[3] Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.
[4] Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1), 2–22.
[5] Dechezleprêtre, A., & Sato, M. (2017). The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), 183–206.
[6] Becker, R., & Henderson, V. (2000). Effects of air quality regulations on polluting industries. Journal of Political Economy, 108(2), 379–421.
[7] Berman, E., & Bui, L. T. M. (2001). Environmental regulation and labor demand: Evidence from the South Coast Air Basin. Journal of Public Economics, 79(2), 265–295.
[8] Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 610–619.
[9] Shapiro, J. S., & Walker, R. (2018). Why is pollution from US manufacturing declining? The roles of environmental regulation, productivity, and trade. American Economic Review, 108(12), 3814–3854.
[10] Lanjouw, J. O., & Mody, A. (1996). Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Research Policy, 25(4), 549–571.
[11] Popp, D. (2002). Induced innovation and energy prices. American Economic Review, 92(1), 160–180.
[12] Newell, R. G., Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N. (1999). The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 941–975.
[13] Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., & Popp, D. (2010). Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45(1), 133–155.
[14] Basberg, B. L. (1987). Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 16(2–4), 131–141.
[15] Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Global Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






