The Balance Between Value and Risk: A Study on Engineering Philosophy and Practice Based on the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge

Authors

  • Shuwen Jia School of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
  • Chongjun Yuan School of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
  • Mingbo Xie School of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n6.12

Keywords:

Engineering Value, Engineering Risk, Risk Control, Acceptable Risk, Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge, Major Project Management

Abstract

As human engineering capabilities enter the era of "mega-projects," the value created by engineering activities and the accompanying risks have reached unprecedented scales and complexity. How to maximize engineering value under high-risk environments has become a key issue in major project management. Using the iconic Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (HZMB) as the research subject, this paper conducts a systematic case study to deeply explore its embodiment within multi-dimensional value systems and complex risk spectra. Focusing on the dynamic decision-making process of "acceptable risk," this paper reveals how engineering decision-makers, guided by strategic, economic, technological, social, and environmental values, utilize technological innovation, meticulous management, and system synergy to reduce various risks from unacceptable levels to the lowest reasonably practicable level of acceptability. This study indicates that risk management for major projects is essentially an art of dynamic balance guided by value rationality. Its successful practice offers significant theoretical insights and practical references for future major project management. This study not only systematically summarizes the innovative practices in risk management during the HZMB project but also reflects on the value realization paths of modern mega-projects from the perspective of engineering philosophy, providing useful references for the decision-making and implementation of similar major infrastructure projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Van I. Poel, D. (2025). Acceptable risk under moral uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research, 28(11), 1320–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2025.2584028

[2] Alqahtani, A. D., Ahmed, M., Mallick, J., et al. (2026). Integrated risk priority assessment of engineering and non-engineering factors influencing Saudi Arabian construction projects. Buildings, 16(8), 1518. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081518

[3] Liu, W., Luo, X., Feng, Z., et al. (2026). Research on risk propagation mechanism and control strategy of prefabricated building supply chain: based on complex network model and dynamic simulation analysis. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(7), 5901–5933. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2024-1480

Downloads

Published

29-06-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Jia, S., Yuan, C., & Xie, M. (2026). The Balance Between Value and Risk: A Study on Engineering Philosophy and Practice Based on the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 10(6), 112-121. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n6.12