Research on the Impact of the Dual Pilot Policy of Low-Carbon City and Green Finance on the Corporate Green Investment

Xiaonuo Xu

doi:10.62051/ijgem.v6n2.05

Authors

Xiaonuo Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v6n2.05

Keywords:

Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy, Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot zone, Corporate Green Investment, Policy coordination

Abstract

To actively address climate change and promote emission reduction and carbon mitigation, the Chinese government has introduced environmental regulation policies such as low-carbon city pilots and green finance reform innovation pilot zones to drive the green and low-carbon transformation of the economy. Corporate green investment plays an indispensable role in this process. Against this backdrop, this paper treats the implementation of China's low-carbon city pilots and green finance reform innovation pilot zones as a quasi-natural experiment. Based on a sample of A-share listed companies in China from 2007 to 2022, the study employs a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) approach to empirically examine the synergistic effects of these two pilot policies on corporate green investment. It also compares the differences in the implementation effects of dual pilot policies (low-carbon city and green finance reform innovation pilot zones) versus single pilot policies. The findings reveal that: (1) both the low-carbon city pilot and the green finance reform innovation pilot zone policies significantly promote corporate green investment, (2) the dual pilot policies effectively enhance the scale of corporate green investment, and (3) the dual pilot policies have a stronger impact on promoting corporate green investment compared to the implementation of either the low-carbon city pilot or the green finance reform innovation pilot zone alone, indicating a synergistic effect between the two policies. From the perspective of corporate green investment, this study provides theoretical support for promoting corporate green and low-carbon transformation and the green development of the economy. It offers policy recommendations for advancing low-carbon urban green development practices, including summarizing and promoting pilot experiences, adopting differentiated strategies tailored to local conditions, strengthening regional green innovation cooperation, and encouraging the synergistic integration of "environmental governance" and "financial development."

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ahmad M, Peng T, Awan A, et al. Policy framework considering resource curse, renewable energy transition, and institutional issues: Fostering sustainable development and sustainable natural resource consumption practices [J]. Resources Policy, 2023, 86: 104173.

[2] Cao J, Li W, Hasan I. The impact of lowering carbon emissions on corporate labour investment: A quasi-natural experiment [J]. Energy Economics, 2023, 121: 106653.

[3] Cao M, Duan K, Ibrahim H. Green investments and their impact on ESG ratings: An evidence from China [J]. Economics Letters, 2023, 232: 111365.

[4] Chen H, Guo W, Feng X, et al. The impact of Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy on the total factor productivity of listed enterprises in China [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 169: 105457.

[5] Chen Y, Feng J. Do corporate green investments improve environmental performance? Evidence from the perspective of efficiency [J]. China Journal of Accounting Studies 7.1, 2020, (01): 62-92.

[6] Ding Q, Huang J, Chen J. Does digital finance matter for corporate green investment? Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China [J]. Energy Economics, 2023, 117: 106476.

[7] Gong M, Liu H, Jiang X. A study on the impact of China’s low-carbon pilot policy on foreign direct investment [J]. China population, resources and environment, 2019, 29(06): 50-57.

[8] Huang L, Lei Z. How environmental regulation affect corporate green investment: evidence from China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 279: 123560.

[9] Khan Z, Ali S, Dong K, et al. How does fiscal decentralization affect CO2 emissions? The roles of institutions and human capital [J]. Energy Economics, 2021, 94: 105060.

[10] Lee C, Feng Y, Peng D. A green path towards sustainable development: The impact of low-carbon city pilot on energy transition [J]. Energy Economics, 2022, 115: 106343.

[11] Li S, Zheng X, Liao J, et al. Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy and corporate environmental performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment [J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2024, 89: 1248-1266.

[12] Liu B, Gan L, Huang K, et al. The impact of Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy on Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from China [J]. Finance Research Letters, 2023: 104055.

[13] Liu F. The impact of China’s Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy on carbon emissions: based on the multi-period DID model [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(34): 81745-81759.

[14] Pan A, Zhang W, Shi X, et al. Climate policy and low-carbon innovation: Evidence from low-carbon city pilots in China [J]. Energy Economics, 2022, 112: 106129.

[15] Pan X, Wang M, Li M. Low-carbon policy and industrial structure upgrading: Based on the perspective of strategic interaction among local governments [J]. Energy Policy, 2023, 183: 113794.

[16] Qi Y, Yuan M, Bai T. Where will corporate capital flow to? Revisiting the impact of China's pilot carbon emission trading system on investment [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 336: 117671.

[17] Ren, Siyu, Yu Hao, and Haitao Wu. How does green investment affect environmental pollution? Evidence from China [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2022, 81: 25-51.

[18] Renström T I, Spataro L, Marsiliani L. Can subsidies rather than pollution taxes break the trade-off between economic output and environmental protection? [J]. Energy Economics, 2021, 95: 105084.

[19] Shen et al. Does green investment, financial development and natural resources rent limit carbon emissions? A provincial panel analysis of China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 755: 142538.

[20] Siedschlag I, Yan W. Do green investments improve firm performance? Empirical evidence from Ireland [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 186: 122181.

[21] Song Y, He Y, Sahut J M, et al. Can Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy decrease urban energy poverty? [J]. Energy Policy, 2024, 186: 113989.

[22] Wang C, Lin K, Liu X. Can the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy promote the upgrading of high-carbon emitting enterprises? Evidence from China [J]. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 2022, 20(3): 217-226.

[23] Yu H, Peng F, Yuan T, et al. The effect of low-carbon pilot policy on low-carbon technological innovation in China: Reexamining the porter hypothesis using difference-in-difference-in-differences strategy [J]. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2023, 8(3): 100392.

[24] Zeng H, Li X, Zhou Q, et al. Local government environmental regulatory pressures and corporate environmental strategies: Evidence from natural resource accountability audits in China [J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2022, 31(7): 3060-3082.

[25] Zhang X, Song Y, Zhang M. Exploring the relationship of green investment and green innovation: Evidence from Chinese corporate performance [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 412: 137444.

[26] Zhou T, Huang X, Zhang N. The effect of innovation pilot on carbon total factor productivity: quasi-experimental evidence from China [J]. Energy Economics, 2023, 125: 106895.