Level of Acceptance and Behavioral Intention on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Internal Audit Procedure

Authors

  • Xiaoyu Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v7n3.32

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Internal Auditing, Behavioral Intention, Acceptance, UTAUT

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into internal auditing is reshaping conventional audit methodologies by enhancing precision, efficiency, and analytical capacity. Despite its growing relevance, the degree to which internal auditors accept and intend to adopt AI technologies remains insufficiently examined. This study investigated the level of acceptance and behavioral intention among accounting professionals toward AI adoption in auditing, guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework. Utilizing a descriptive-correlational research design, data were gathered from 431 accounting professionals selected through stratified random sampling. The research instrument assessed acceptance across four UTAUT constructs—Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, and Facilitating Conditions—and evaluated respondents’ behavioral intention to adopt AI tools. Results indicated generally high acceptance levels, with Performance Expectancy and Effort Expectancy emerging as key drivers. Significant differences in acceptance and intention were observed based on demographic variables such as age, job position, and AI familiarity. Furthermore, strong positive correlations were found between all acceptance constructs and behavioral intention. The study recommends targeted capacity-building initiatives and improved organizational infrastructure to facilitate successful AI integration. These findings provide valuable insights into the human and organizational dynamics influencing AI adoption in internal audit contexts and inform strategic planning for technology-driven transformation in the profession.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Abdullah, A. A. H., & Almaqtari, F. A. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence and Industry 4.0 on transforming accounting and auditing practices. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100218. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc100100218

[2] Albawwat, I. E., & Frijat, Y. A. (2021). An analysis of auditors’ perceptions towards artificial intelligence and its contribution to audit quality. Growing Science, 755-762. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2021.2.009

[3] Alghatrifi, I., & Khalid, H. (2019). A systematic review of UTAUT and UTAUT2 as a baseline framework of information system research in adopting new technology: A case study of IPV6 adoption. https://doi.org/10.1109/icriis48246.2019.9073292

[4] Attié, E., & Meyer-Waarden, L. (2022). The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: An enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification, and privacy calculus theories. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121485

[5] Cao, G., Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021, June 8). Understanding managers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions towards using artificial intelligence for organizational decision-making. Technovation, 106, 102312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102312

[6] Daidj, N. (2022). The digital transformation of auditing and the evolution of the internal audit. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003215110

[7] Fedorko, I., Bačik, R., & Gavurova, B. (2021). Effort expectancy and social influence factors as main determinants of performance expectancy using electronic banking. Banks and Bank Systems, 16(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(2).2021.03

[8] Fetais, A. H., Faisal, M. N., Sabir, L. B., & Al Esmael, B. (2022). Artificial intelligence adoption for e-government: Analysis of enablers in an emerging economy. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 18(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2022010101

[9] Iwuanyanwu, U., Apeh, A. J., Adaramodu, O. R., Okeleke, E. C., & Fakeyede, O. G. (2023). Analyzing the role of artificial intelligence in IT audit: Current practices and future prospects. Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 4(2), 54-68. https://doi.org/10.23956/csitrj.2023.0402001

[10] Liu, X., & Zhang, L. (2024). Exploring the relationship between teachers' professional capital and technology-enhanced teaching innovation: The mediating role of constructivist belief. Teaching and Teacher Education, 139, 104434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104434

[11] Seethamraju, R., & Hecimovic, A. (2023). Adoption of artificial intelligence in auditing: An exploratory study. Australian Journal of Management, 48(4), 780-800. https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962221108440

[12] Şen, Y. (2023). Auditors' perceptions of artificial intelligence: Evidence from global audit companies (Master's thesis, İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi). https://gcris.ieu.edu.tr/bitstream/20.500.14365/156/1/1560.pdf

[13] Shahzadi, G., Jia, F., Chen, L., & John, A. (2024). AI adoption in supply chain management: A systematic literature review. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 35(6), 1125-1150. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmtm-09-2023-0431

[14] Virmani, N., Singh, R. K., Agarwal, V., & Aktas, E. (2024). Artificial intelligence applications for responsive healthcare supply chains: A decision-making framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.1234567

Downloads

Published

29-07-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chen, X. (2025). Level of Acceptance and Behavioral Intention on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Internal Audit Procedure. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 7(3), 287-292. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v7n3.32