Living Inheritance and Industrial Synergy: A Study on the Multi-stakeholder Governance Mechanism for Foshan ‘Kung Fu’ and ‘Lion Dance’ IP Empowering the Integration of Culture, Commerce, and Tourism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v8n3.24Keywords:
Cultural IP, Living Inheritance, Industrial Synergy, Integration of Culture, Commerce, and Tourism, Multi-stakeholder Governance, Foshan Kung Fu, Lion Dance CultureAbstract
Against the backdrop of the national strategy for cultural confidence and the deep integration of culture and tourism, how to achieve the living inheritance and industrial value transformation of local characteristic cultural IP has become a significant issue of our time. As cultural symbols with global influence, Foshan's "Kung Fu" and "Lion Dance" face practical dilemmas in their integrated development of culture, commerce, and tourism, including the erosion of cultural authenticity, the lack of an industrial linkage mechanism, and an imbalance of rights and responsibilities among multiple stakeholders. Traditional single-governance models led by the government or driven by the market are no longer adequate to meet the developmental needs of this complex system. Based on the theory of multi-stakeholder governance and integrating the intrinsic requirements of industrial synergy and the living inheritance of cultural IP, this paper systematically analyzes the interaction logic and governance imbalances among the three main stakeholders—government, enterprises, and social communities—in the process of Foshan's "Kung Fu" and "Lion Dance" IP empowering the integrated development of regional culture, commerce, and tourism. The study posits that the key to resolving the current dilemmas lies in constructing a new paradigm of multi-stakeholder governance centered on synergistic co-existence. The core of this mechanism is to promote the precise repositioning of each stakeholder's role: the government should shift from being a "leader" to a "guide" and "regulator," focusing on top-level design, platform construction, and market order maintenance; enterprises should transform from "developers" to "innovators" and "co-constructors," assuming social responsibility for cultural inheritance while pursuing economic benefits; and social communities must evolve from "passive inheritors" to "active participants" and "supervisors," becoming the guardians of cultural authenticity and proactive forces in value co-creation. To ensure the effective operation of this mechanism, it is imperative to establish regular platforms for negotiation and dialogue, innovative mechanisms for benefit distribution and incentives, a dynamic evaluation and feedback system, and to improve corresponding policies, regulations, and intellectual property protection systems. This research aims to provide a theoretical reference and practical guide for the protective development and sustainable growth of similar local characteristic cultural IPs in Foshan and across the nation.
Downloads
References
[1] Wang Xiaoyan, & Chen Dan. (2022). A Study on the Branding Construction and Communication Strategy of Regional Cultural IP—A Case Study of "Bing Dwen Dwen". News and Writing, (5), 75-81. [in Chinese]
[2] Zhang Hui, & Ma Xiaolong. (2023). A Study on Value Co-creation of Intangible Cultural Heritage Tourism Experience Empowered by Digital Technology. Tourism Tribune, 38(7), 96-108. [in Chinese]
[3] Li Xiangjun. (2022). Modern Transformation and Industrial Upgrading of Intangible Cultural Heritage Resources from the Perspective of Cultural Economics. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press. [in Chinese]
[4] UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage.
[5] Liu Jia, & Huang Yuanshui. (2021). A Study on the Ecosystem Construction of Culture and Tourism Industry Integration Driven by IP. Economic Geography, 41(4), 218-226. [in Chinese]
[6] Yu Keping. (2000). Governance and Good Governance. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press. [in Chinese]
[7] Chen Shaofeng. (2019). Business Models and Cases of Cultural Industries. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press. [in Chinese]
[8] Xiong Chengyu. (2021). New Media and Cultural and Creative Industries. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press. [in Chinese]
[9] Sun Ruofeng. (2020). Theory and Practice of Productive Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Cultural Heritage, (3), 1-9. [in Chinese]
[10] Ostrom, E. (2012). Governing the Commons (Y. Xunda & C. Xudong, Trans.). Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Global Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






