Conflict of Interest and Coordination Mechanism in Multi-Agent Collaboration: Analysis of Institutional Tension in the Supply Chain of Technological Innovation

Fangaolei Chen; Haolin Yang

doi:10.62051/ijgem.v10n1.03

Authors

Fangaolei Chen
Haolin Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n1.03

Keywords:

Technological innovation supply chain, Multi-party collaboration, Conflicts of interest, Institutional innovation, Incentive mechanisms

Abstract

The coordination mechanisms for resolving conflicts of interest among multiple stakeholders are crucial for the efficient operation of science and technology innovation supply chains. The fixed proportion allocation model and static incentive system prove inadequate for complex innovation practices, while flexible distribution methods, dynamic adjustments, and multidimensional performance evaluation systems better stimulate initiative and ensure collaborative stability. Multi-level governance frameworks, consensus-building culture cultivation, and incentive compensation mechanisms at the local policy level provide robust safeguards to mitigate cooperation friction and enhance collaborative innovation capabilities. The study concludes that institutional innovation and incentive mechanism optimization serve as the foundation for promoting efficient multi-stakeholder collaboration in science and technology innovation supply chains, enabling resource integration and sustainable development of innovation ecosystems. These findings offer theoretical support and practical references for regional innovation governance and policy formulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Golpayegani, Fatemeh, et al. "Participant selection for short-term collaboration in open multi-agent systems." Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 83 (2018): 149-161.

[2] Geels, Frank W. "From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory." Research policy 33.6-7 (2004): 897-920.

[3] Berrone, Pascual, et al. "Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations." Strategic management journal 34.8 (2013): 891-909.

[4] Hinings, Bob, Thomas Gegenhuber, and Royston Greenwood. "Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective." Information and organization 28.1 (2018): 52-61.

[5] Morgan, Kevin. "The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal." Regional studies 41.S1 (2007): S147-S159.

[6] Raisch, Sebastian, and Julian Birkinshaw. "Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators." Journal of management 34.3 (2008): 375-409.

[7] Hekkert, Marko P., et al. "Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change." Technological forecasting and social change 74.4 (2007): 413-432.

[8] Kimberly, John R., and Michael J. Evanisko. "Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations." Academy of management journal 24.4 (1981): 689-713.

[9] Van de Ven, Andrew H. "Central problems in the management of innovation." Management science 32.5 (1986): 590-607.

[10] Henri, Jean-François. "Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective." Accounting, organizations and society 31.6 (2006): 529-558.