Research on the Impact Mechanism of ESG Practice and Policy Stability on Corporate Financing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n1.04Keywords:
ESG practices, Policy stability, Corporate financing, Impact pathway, Information asymmetryAbstract
This article focuses on the impact logic of ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) practices and policy stability on corporate financing. By combining information asymmetry theory, institutional economics theory, and the current status of corporate financing practices, the article analyzes the pathways of the two - ESG practices optimize financing conditions directly by mitigating information gaps and strengthening corporate reputation, while policy stability focuses on reducing environmental uncertainty and regulating the financing empowerment effect of ESG practices. The two work together to build a healthy ecosystem for corporate financing. Research has found that standardized ESG practices can effectively weaken the risk concerns of financial institutions and investors, while continuous and stable policies can build confidence in corporate ESG investment, further loosening the financing environment. All conclusions are based on public policy documents, industry reports, and academic achievements, which can provide practical references for enterprises to optimize financing strategies and governments to formulate relevant policies.
Downloads
References
[1] Friede G, Busch T, Bassen A. ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies [J]. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 2015, 5(4): 210-233.
[2] Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J A. Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth [J]. Handbook of economic growth, 2005, 1: 385-472.
[3] Gorton G, Winton A. Financial intermediation [M]//Handbook of the Economics of Finance. Elsevier, 2003, 1: 431-552.
[4] Hou Q Y, Zhang Q. The Effect and Mechanism of ESG Performance on Corporate Debt Financing Costs: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in the Heavy-Polluting Industries [J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2024, 33(2): 1753-1766.
[5] D’Arcangelo F M, Kruse T, Pisu M, et al. Corporate cost of debt in the low-carbon transition: The effect of climate policies on firm financing and investment through the banking channel [J]. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 2023.
[6] Luo Z, Li Y, Nguyen L T, et al. The moderating role of country governance in the link between ESG and financial performance: A study of listed companies in 58 countries [J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(13): 5410.
[7] Li W, Hu H, Hong Z. Green finance policy, ESG rating, and cost of debt——Evidence from China [J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2024, 92: 103051.
[8] Ye X, Tian X. Green finance and ESG performance: A quasi-natural experiment on the influence of green financing pilot zones [J]. Research in International Business and Finance, 2025, 73: 102647.
[9] Dye J, McKinnon M, Van der Byl C. Green gaps: Firm ESG disclosure and financial institutions’ reporting Requirements [J]. Journal of Sustainability Research, 2021, 3(1).
[10] Ge H H, Zhang X X. From uncertainty to sustainability: How climate policy uncertainty shapes corporate ESG? [J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2025, 98: 104011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Global Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






