Research on the Impact of Resource Allocation on the Living Standards of Residents in Impoverished Areas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n1.05Keywords:
Resource allocation, Poverty-stricken areas, Living standards, Empirical analysis, Two-way fixed effects, Multiple linear regression, Rural revitalizationAbstract
Resource allocation is the core lever for adjusting regional development gaps and improving the living standards of residents in poverty-stricken areas. This article is based on the background of the connection between poverty alleviation and rural revitalization, focusing on the five resource dimensions of education, healthcare, infrastructure, industrial support, and public services. Through literature research, policy analysis, and quantitative empirical methods (two-way fixed effects multiple linear regression model), empirical induction is used to explore their impact mechanisms on residents' income, quality of life, and development opportunities. Research has found that balanced resource allocation determines the foundation for the survival and development of residents in poverty-stricken areas. Investment in education and industry resources enhances long-term income generating capacity, optimization of healthcare and infrastructure reduces living costs and risks, and improvement of public services narrows the urban-rural gap. There are still problems in poverty-stricken areas, such as insufficient precision in resource allocation, poor flow of urban and rural resources, and incomplete mechanisms for diversified investment. This article proposes precise matching of needs, building a diversified investment system, and strengthening policy guarantees, providing practical references for improving residents' living standards and promoting comprehensive rural revitalization.
Downloads
References
[1] Dong Y, Jin G, Deng X, et al. Multidimensional measurement of poverty and its spatio-temporal dynamics in China from the perspective of development geography [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2021, 31(1): 130-148.
[2] Rambodagedara R, Silva D A C, Perera S. Agro-tourism development in farming community: Opportunities and challenges [M]. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Hector Kobbekaduwa Agrarian Research and Training Institute, 2015.
[3] Chen C, Pan J. The effect of the health poverty alleviation project on financial risk protection for rural residents: evidence from Chishui City, China [J]. International journal for equity in health, 2019, 18(1): 79.
[4] Robinson B. Using distance education and ICT to improve access, equity and the quality in rural teachers’ professional development in western China [J]. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2008, 9(1): 1-17.
[5] Magazzino C, Mele M. On the relationship between transportation infrastructure and economic development in China [J]. Research in Transportation Economics, 2021, 88: 100947.
[6] Liu Y, Guo Y, Zhou Y. Poverty alleviation in rural China: Policy changes, future challenges and policy implications [J]. China Agricultural Economic Review, 2018, 10(2): 241-259.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Global Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






