An Empirical Study on the Technological Innovation Paths of Advanced Manufacturing Industry Clusters in the Chengdu–Chongqing Twin-City Economic Circle Based on High-Value Patents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n2.02Keywords:
Chengdu–Chongqing Twin-City Economic Circle, Advanced manufacturing industry clusters, High-value patents, Technological path evolution, Patent citation networkAbstract
Collaborative innovation within advanced manufacturing industry clusters in the Chengdu–Chongqing Twin-City Economic Circle is an important measure for Western China to move toward high-quality development, promote coordinated regional progress, and improve the national strategic layout. However, existing research on the technological evolution paths of advanced manufacturing clusters in this region remains relatively scarce. To address this gap, this study constructs a high-value patent citation network using citation data of patents from advanced manufacturing clusters in the Chengdu–Chongqing Twin-City Economic Circle over the past decade, applies the SPC algorithm to identify technological paths, and conducts an empirical analysis of the technological evolution characteristics in key fields. The results show that the technological innovation paths of advanced manufacturing industry clusters in the Chengdu–Chongqing Twin-City Economic Circle tend to evolve from resource scheduling toward intelligent optimization, forming a collaborative innovation pattern centered on resource allocation and task scheduling. Under the background of cross-domain collaboration, technological evolution exhibits multi-path integration and stage-wise bifurcation. Accordingly, the paper proposes policy recommendations such as building intelligent manufacturing collaboration chains, improving technological integration mechanisms, and strengthening industry–academia–research collaboration systems, so as to promote the high-quality development of advanced manufacturing industry clusters in the region.
Downloads
References
[1] PORTER M E. Clusters and the new economics of competition [J]. Harv Bus Rev, 1998, 76(6): 77-90.
[2] ZHONG R Y, XU X, KLOTZ E, et al. Intelligent Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Review [J]. Engineering, 2017, 3(5): 616-630.
[3] WANG H, KANG C. Digital economy and the green transformation of manufacturing industry: evidence from Chinese cities [J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2024, 12.
[4] ZHANG H, NIE S, WAN L. The Impact of the Convergence of Advanced Manufacturing and Modern Services on Green Innovation Efficiency [J]. Sustainability, 2025, 17(2): 492.
[5] ETZKOWITZ H, BROSTRÖM A. The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action [Z]. 2011: 90, 441-442.
[6] CHESBROUGH H W, VANHAVERBEKE W, WEST J. Open innovation: researching a new paradigm [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
[7] AHUJA G. Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study [J]. Administrative science quarterly, 2000, 45(3): 425-455.
[8] DENG J, CHEN T, ZHANG Y. Effect of Collaborative Innovation on High-Quality Economic Development in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration—An Empirical Analysis Based on the Spatial Durbin Model [J]. Mathematics, 2023, 11(8): 1909.
[9] JIN C, FAN C, GONG Y, et al. An analysis of spatial changes in the manufacturing industry in china’s three major urban clusters from 2015 to 2019 using POI data [J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 7401.
[10] GRANSTRAND O. Evolving properties of intellectual capitalism: patents and innovations for growth and welfare [M]. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
[11] PARK J, LEE H, PARK Y. Disembodied knowledge flows among industrial clusters: A patent analysis of the Korean manufacturing sector [J]. Technology in Society, 2009, 31(1): 73-84.
[12] SQUICCIARINI M, DERNIS H, CRISCUOLO C. Measuring Patent Quality: Indicators of Technological and Economic Value, 1 [R]. OECD Publishing, 2013.
[13] HU Z, ZHOU X, LIN A. Evaluation and identification of potential high-value patents in the field of integrated circuits using a multidimensional patent indicators pre-screening strategy and machine learning approaches [J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2023, 17(2): 101406.
[14] MEYER U, SCHUBERT C. Integrating path dependency and path creation in a general understanding of path constitution [J]. technische universität dortmund, 2007.
[15] EPICOCO M. Knowledge patterns and sources of leadership: Mapping the semiconductor miniaturization trajectory [J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(1): 180-195.
[16] PARK H, MAGEE C L. Tracing Technological Development Trajectories: A Genetic Knowledge Persistence-Based Main Path Approach [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12(1): e170895.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Global Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






