Research on the Application and Information Disclosure of Third Level Input Values in Fair Value Measurement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n2.17Keywords:
Fair value measurement, Third level input value, Information disclosure, Valuation techniques, Standard specificationsAbstract
Fair value measurement is a core measurement attribute of modern financial accounting. In its hierarchical division, the third level input value has become a key and difficult point in practical application and information disclosure due to its dependence on unobservable data and valuation techniques. This article is based on the relevant regulations of IFRS 13 and CAS 39 in China, using literature research and normative research methods to analyze the operational difficulties and disclosure status. Research has found that Chinese enterprises have problems with inconsistent valuation techniques, subjective parameter settings, and insufficient data verifiability in the application of this input value. Disclosure also has deficiencies such as insufficient content, vague expression, poor comparability, and lack of sensitivity analysis. The main causes are the strong principle guidance of the standards, insufficient valuation ability of enterprises, imperfect external environment, and lack of regulatory strength. This article proposes to refine practical guidelines, enhance the level of enterprise valuation, build a unified valuation database, strengthen regulatory accountability, and improve its application and disclosure quality. The research conclusion can provide reference for enterprises to standardize operations and regulatory agencies to optimize policies, helping to improve the relevance and reliability of financial reporting information.
Downloads
References
[1] Barker, R. (2015). Conservatism, prudence and the IASB’s conceptual framework. Accounting and Business Research, 45(4), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1031983
[2] Abdel-Khalik, A.R. (2019) ‘Failing faithful representations of financial statements: Issues in reporting financial instruments’, Abacus, 55(4), pp. 676–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12176.
[3] Hartmann, B., Marton, J. and Söderström, R. (2018) ‘The improbability of fraud in accounting for derivatives: A case study on the boundaries of financial reporting compliance’, European Accounting Review, 27(5), pp. 845–873. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1494022.
[4] Herrmann, D., Saudagaran, S.M. and Thomas, W.B. (2006) ‘The quality of fair value measures for property, plant, and equipment’, Accounting Forum, 30(1), pp. 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2005.09.001.
[5] Taplin, R., Yuan, W. and Brown, A. (2014) ‘The use of fair value and historical cost accounting for investment properties in China’, Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 8(1), pp. 101–113. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v8i1.6.
[6] Pelger, C. (2020). The Return of Stewardship, Reliability and Prudence – A Commentary on the IASB’s New Conceptual Framework. Accounting in Europe, 17(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2019.1645960
[7] Knauer, T., & Wöhrmann, A. (2016). Market Reaction to Goodwill Impairments. European Accounting Review, 25(3), 421–449. https://doi-org.ezproxy2.lib.gla.ac.uk/10.1080/09638180.2015.1042888.
[8] Zeff, S. A. (2013). The objectives of financial reporting: a historical survey and analysis. Accounting and Business Research, 43(4), 262–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2013.782237
[9] Israeli, D. (2015) ‘Recognition versus disclosure: Evidence from fair value of investment property’, Review of Accounting Studies, 20(4), pp. 1457–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-015-9335-x.
[10] Mazzi, F., Liberatore, G., & Tsalavoutas, I. (2016). Insights on CFOs’ perceptions about impairment testing under IAS 36. Accounting in Europe, 13(3), 353-379.
[11] André, P., Dionysiou, D. and Tsalavoutas, I. (2018) ‘Mandated disclosures under IAS 36 impairment of assets and IAS 38 intangible assets: Value relevance and impact on analysts’ forecasts’, Applied Economics, 50(7), pp. 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1340570.
[12] Sundgren, S., Mäki, J. and Somoza-López, A. (2018) ‘Analyst coverage, market liquidity and disclosure quality: A study of fair-value disclosures by European real estate companies under IAS 40 and IFRS 13’, The International Journal of Accounting, 53(1), pp. 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2018.02.003.
[13] Vincent O'Connell; Reflections on Stewardship Reporting. Accounting Horizons 1 June 2007; 21 (2): 215–227. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2007.21.2.215
[14] Kuhner, C. and Pelger, C. (2015), On the Relationship of Stewardship and Valuation. Abacus, 51: 379-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12053
[15] Lennard, A. (2007). Stewardship and the Objectives of Financial Statements: A Comment on IASB’s Preliminary Views on an Improved Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting: The Objective of Financial Reporting and Qualitative Characteristics of Decision-Useful Financial Reporting Information 1. Accounting in Europe, 4(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480701308774
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Global Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






