The Impact of AIGC's Emotional Expression on Consumer Service Evaluation in Service Failure Contexts: The Mediating Role of Expectation Disconfirmation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n2.18Keywords:
AIGC, Emotional expression, Service failure, Service evaluation, Expectation disconfirmationAbstract
With the widespread application of generative artificial intelligence (AIGC) in the service sector, its performance in service failure scenarios has become a key focus for both academia and practice. Based on Expectation Disconfirmation Theory, this study employs a scenario-based experiment to investigate the impact of AIGC’s level of emotional expression (high vs. low) on consumer service evaluations in service failure contexts, as well as the underlying mechanism. The results show that compared to AIGC with low emotional expression, AIGC with high emotional expression triggers more negative service evaluations from consumers when a service failure occurs. Further mechanism analysis reveals that expectation disconfirmation plays a key mediating role: high emotional expression elevates consumers’ initial expectations, and when a service failure occurs, the significant expectation gap (i.e., negative disconfirmation) is the fundamental reason for the decline in service evaluations. This study reveals the "double-edged sword" effect of AIGC’s anthropomorphic strategy in service failure contexts, deepens the understanding of the boundary conditions of emotional expression in human-computer interaction, and provides important theoretical and practical insights for enterprises to optimize AIGC service design and implement effective expectation management and service recovery.
Downloads
References
[1] Han E, Yin D, Zhang H. Bots with Feelings: Should AI Agents Express Positive Emotion in Customer Service? [J]. Information Systems Research, 2022, 34(3): 1296-1311.
[2] Choi S, Mattila A S, Bolton L E. To Err Is Human(-oid): How Do Consumers React to Robot Service Failure and Recovery? [J]. Journal of Service Research, 2021, 24(3): 354-371.
[3] Kranzbühler A M, Zerres A, Kleijnen M H P, et al. Beyond valence: a meta-analysis of discrete emotions in firm-customer encounters [J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2020, 48(3): 478-498.
[4] De Kervenoael R, Hasan R, Schwob A, et al. Leveraging human-robot interaction in hospitality services: Incorporating the role of perceived value, empathy, and information sharing into visitorsâ intentions to use social robots [J]. Tourism Management, 2020, 78: 104042.
[5] Yam K C, Bigman Y E, Tang P M, et al. Robots at work: People prefer—and forgive—service robots with perceived feelings [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2021, 106(10): 1557-1572.
[6] Broadbent E. Interactions With Robots: The Truths We Reveal About Ourselves [J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2017, 68(1): 627-652.
[7] Xie Y, Liang C, Zhou P, et al. Exploring the influence mechanism of chatbot-expressed humor on service satisfaction in online customer service [J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2024, 76: 103599.
[8] Oliver R L. Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: An alternative interpretation [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977, 62(4): 480-486.
[9] Burgoon J K. Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication [J]. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1993, 12(1-2): 30-48.
[10] Hayes A F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach [M]. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press, 2013: xvii, 507.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Global Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






