The Quality of Teacher-Student Interaction and University Students’ Self-Efficacy

Authors

  • Xiaoyan Niu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n5.12

Keywords:

Quality of teacher-student interaction, Self-efficacy, University students, Social cognitive theory, Classroom teaching

Abstract

As a core variable influencing university students’ learning engagement, academic achievement and mental health, the development of self-efficacy is closely linked to the quality of teacher-student interaction in the classroom. Drawing on social cognitive theory, this paper systematically analyses the connotations and dimensions of the quality of teacher-student interaction, and explores four core pathways through which it influences university students’ self-efficacy: verbal persuasion, vicarious experience, direct experience of success, and emotional arousal. Building on this, the paper further distinguishes the differential effects of four interaction types—supportive, challenging, egalitarian, and feedback-oriented interactions—on self-efficacy, and proposes teaching strategies to enhance the quality of interaction in order to strengthen students’ self-efficacy. Research indicates that high-quality teacher-student interaction not only directly enhances students’ self-efficacy but also produces lasting effects through mechanisms such as establishing a safe psychological learning environment, providing precise demonstrations of learning strategies, and promoting positive shifts in students’ attributional styles. This paper provides a theoretical basis for promoting students’ psychological development through the optimisation of teacher-student interaction in higher education practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (pp. 3–6). W. H. Freeman.

[2] Zhang, D. K., Fang, L. L., & Ling, W. Z. (1999). Theories and current research on self-efficacy. Psychology Bulletin, 7(1), 39–43.

[3] Zhou, T. Y., & Zhou, Z. Y. (2010). Factors influencing and mechanisms of interaction between teachers and students in higher education institutions. Jiangsu Higher Education, (4), 78–81.

[4] Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory (pp. 390–409). Prentice-Hall.

[5] Bian, Y. F. (2004). Self-efficacy in learning and its cultivation. Research on Educational Development, (3), 68–70.

[6] Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualising, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). Springer.

[7] Chai, X. Y., & Guo, Y. Y. (2013). Autonomy support in the classroom environment and students’ intrinsic motivation. Educational Research and Experiment, (2), 78–82.

[8] Wang, Y. X., & Lei, W. S. (2006). A review of research on self-efficacy. Contemporary Education Forum, (12), 124–125.

[9] Zhang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2009). A study on the relationship between attribution styles and self-efficacy among university students. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology, 17(4), 434–436.

[10] Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_4

[11] Zhang, J. L., & Mao, J. P. (2007). A study on the relationship between university students’ academic self-efficacy and achievement attribution. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 15(2), 186–188.

[12] Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

[13] Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9

[14] Li, X. Y., & Song, X. L. (2011). A study on the relationship between university students’ self-efficacy and academic emotions. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology, 19(9), 1095–1097.

[15] Sun, L. H. (2014). A study on the impact of teacher-student interaction in higher education institutions on student development. Monthly Journal of Education, (6), 70–74.

[16] Liu, L., & Chen, X. (2015). The impact of challenging teaching on university students’ self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Science, (7), 52–54.

[17] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

[18] Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654302984870

[19] Zhang, M. (2013). The influence of teachers’ non-verbal behaviour on the quality of classroom interaction. Teaching and Management, (18), 46–48.

[20] Guo, B. Y., & Jiang, F. Y. (2008). Self-efficacy theory and its applications (pp. 156–168). Shanghai Education Press.

Downloads

Published

29-05-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Niu, X. (2026). The Quality of Teacher-Student Interaction and University Students’ Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 10(5), 116-124. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n5.12