Challenges and Paths of Hydrogen Energy Transportation Risk Management from a Full Life Cycle Perspective

Authors

  • Wanping Du School of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
  • Jinhao Lao School of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n6.10

Keywords:

Dual carbon goals, Hydrogen transport, Risk assessment, Full life cycle management, Safety management

Abstract

Under the impetus of the dual carbon strategy, hydrogen energy faces a critical transport bottleneck due to high costs and safety risks, intensified by hydrogen’s extreme flammability, wide explosive limits, and metal embrittlement. This study introduces lifecycle management into hydrogen transport safety, systematically identifying key risks across high-pressure tube trailers, liquid hydrogen tankers, pipelines, and solid-state storage, and analyzing accident mechanisms including fatigue failure, hydrogen embrittlement cracking, vapor flash ignition, and vacuum failure, with emphasis on amplification effects in tunnels and refueling station unloading. The root cause is identified as fragmented management and information silos across production, transport, utilization, and disposal, enabling risk propagation without full-lifecycle accountability. A three-dimensional strategy is proposed: technologically, dynamic risk models using connected vehicle data and active leak defense like acoustic detection and catalytic abatement; managerially, lifelong electronic equipment archives and closed-loop handover information flows; institutionally, green design and recycling standards aligned with dual carbon goals, plus carbon trading to incentivize safety upgrades. Breaking cross-chain barriers and building a safety narrative from inception to decommissioning for every asset is fundamental to achieving intrinsic hydrogen transport safety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] San Marchi, C. W., & Somerday, B. P. (2012). Technical reference on hydrogen compatibility of materials (Report No. SAND2012-7321). Sandia National Laboratories.

[2] Hussein, H., Brennan, S., Shentsov, V., Makarov, D., & Molkov, V. (2010). CFD modelling of underexpanded hydrogen jets and resulting jet fires. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Hazards, Prevention, and Mitigation of Industrial Explosions.

[3] Li, Y., Xiao, J., Zhang, T., & Benard, P. (2021). Numerical analysis of hydrogen release and dispersion in a tunnel with mechanical ventilation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(23), 12477–12487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01211

[4] Schmidt, D., Krause, U., & Schmidtchen, U. (2012). Large scale experiments on hydrogen dispersion, combustion, and explosion. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(3), 2589–2597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.063

[5] Verfondern, K. (2008). Safety aspects of the use of hydrogen: A compendium. Forschungszentrum Jülich.

[6] Ichard, M., Hansen, O. R., Middha, P., & Skjold, T. (2012). CFD modelling of the fluid dynamics of large scale cryogenic hydrogen releases. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 26, 507–512. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1226085

[7] Florisson, O., et al. (2010). Preparing for the hydrogen economy by using the existing natural gas system as a catalyst (NaturalHy) [Final project report]. European Commission.

[8] Arafah, M., & Bock, S. (2018). Numerical simulation of ductile crack propagation in hydrogen gas pipelines. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 168, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2018.09.006

[9] Zheng, J., Liu, X., Xu, P., Liu, P., Zhao, Y., & Yang, J. (2012). Development of high pressure gaseous hydrogen storage technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(1), 1048–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.09.084

[10] Wang, G., Li, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Institutional obstacles and policy recommendations for the development of hydrogen energy industry in China. Macroeconomic Management, (3), 50–56.

[11] Zhang, L., et al. (2019). HAZOP analysis of hydrogen tube bundle vehicle unloading operations in hydrogen refueling stations. Safety, Health and Environment, 19(5), 1–5.

[12] Li, M., Wang, H., & Zhao, W. (2021). Research on comprehensive safety risk evaluation of hydrogen transport mode based on AHP. Chinese Journal of Safety Production Science and Technology, 17(8), 137–142.

Downloads

Published

29-06-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Du, W., & Lao, J. (2026). Challenges and Paths of Hydrogen Energy Transportation Risk Management from a Full Life Cycle Perspective. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 10(6), 94-102. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n6.10