Market Impacts and Governance Dilemmas of Algorithmic Personalized Pricing in 2026

Authors

  • Wanxin Xia Byron College - The British International School, Pallini 15351, Greece

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n8.03

Keywords:

Personalized Pricing, Algorithmic Bias, Corporate Profits, Public Governance, Consumer Welfare

Abstract

Nowadays, the long-standing belief that product prices are uniform for everyone almost no longer exists. With the big data explosion and the growth of artificial intelligence (AI), personalized pricing has entered an in-depth stage where businesses leverage online activity data, browsing records, and real-time demographics to formulate tailored pricing. This paper examines the multi-faceted impacts of personalized pricing across corporate and governmental sectors in 2026. While personalized pricing drives short-term corporate profits and expands market access for price-sensitive groups through a data-driven "Robin Hood" effect, these gains face rapid erosion in the long term. High data infrastructure overhead, algorithmic fragmentation, and customer poaching shrink corporate margins, while perceived unfairness severely damages brand loyalty. In the governance landscape, governments can leverage personalized pricing to automate social welfare and optimize infrastructure demand. However, risks such as public trust erosion, algorithmic bias, and systemic discrimination persist. We conclude that strict algorithmic audits are necessary to protect consumer privacy and market equity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Louail, T., Lenormand, M., Arias, J. M., & Ramasco, J. J. (2017). Crowdsourcing the Robin Hood effect in cities. Applied Network Science, 2(1), 11.

[2] Edward Elgar Publishing. (2022). Pricing algorithms: The risk of collusion and personalised pricing. In Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (pp. 64 75).

[3] Federal Trade Commission. (2025, January 17). Surveillance pricing. https://www.ftc.gov

[4] Steinberg, M. (2020). The economics of individual reservation pricing. Academic Press.

[5] Maughan, R., & Maughan, R. (2026, March 9). Surveillance pricing: 62% of Americans concerned about retailers using data based personalized prices. Talker Research.

[6] R., K. D., & J., T. M. S. (2026). Psychological pricing strategies: A critical review of its effects on brand perception and consumer behaviour. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR JBM).

[7] Dubé, J., & Misra, S. (2017a). Personalized pricing and consumer welfare. National Bureau of Economic Research.

[8] Wallheimer, B. (2018). The profit potential of personalized pricing experiments. Chicago Booth Review.

[9] Stein, E., Robinson, K., Wolfer, A., Almeida, G., & Huang, W. (2026, January 30). Unlocking the next frontier of personalized marketing. McKinsey & Company.

[10] Uniform. (2025, August 22). Personalization marketing fails: Why companies struggle in 2025. https://uniform.dev

[11] Izaret, J. M., & Schürmann, J. (2019, January 17). Why progressive pricing is becoming a competitive necessity. BCG.

[12] Peer, S., et al. (2016). Evaluating behavioral shifts of commuters under dynamic reward systems. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[13] Nowak, M., & Pawłowska Nowak, M. (2024, December 7). Dynamic pricing method in the E Commerce industry using machine learning. Special issue artificial intelligence and machine learning applications.

[14] Rosenblum, L., et al. (2026). Algorithmic bias and regulatory impacts. Journal of Legal Technology.

[15] Yuldasheva, O., et al. (2020). Competitive forces and the rise of data driven monopolies. Journal of Business Studies.

Downloads

Published

31-08-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Xia, W. (2026). Market Impacts and Governance Dilemmas of Algorithmic Personalized Pricing in 2026. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 10(8), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v10n8.03