Legal Analysis of Richard (Rick) Brandt’s Fraudulent Schemes and Their Economic and Social Impacts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62051/ijgem.v6n3.16Keywords:
Fraudulent Activities, Ponzi Scheme, Elderly Exploitation, Unregistered Securities, Legal AnalysisAbstract
This paper analyzes the legal case of State of Montana v. Richard (Rick) Brandt, focusing on his fraudulent activities from 2011 to 2015. Brandt exploited the elderly, embezzled public funds, sold unregistered securities, and ran a Ponzi scheme through his company, Home Investors LLC. The paper examines the criminal aspects of his actions and their broader social and economic impacts, particularly the vulnerability of the elderly in financial transactions. It also explores how legal frameworks determine whether multiple crimes can be combined, using Brandt’s conviction for five crimes as a case study. The paper employs a Venn diagram to visualize the overlap of elements in different offenses, highlighting factors like intent, circumstances, and statutory definitions. Additionally, it discusses the effects of Ponzi schemes on public trust and investor confidence, advocating for stronger regulatory measures and protections for vulnerable populations. Finally, the paper provides insights into how legal systems handle financial fraud, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive oversight in financial markets to prevent future fraud.
Downloads
References
[1] FR OSWALD AJ MASCARENHAS S. The Destruction of Free Enterprise Capitalist System When Infected by Fraud, Corruption, and Bribery [M]. Corporate Ethics for Turbulent Markets. Emerald Publishing Limited. 2018: 155-88.
[2] LEWIS M K. Understanding Ponzi schemes: can better financial regulation prevent investors from being defrauded? [M]. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015.
[3] BUTTON M, LEWIS C, TAPLEY J. Not a victimless crime: The impact of fraud on individual victims and their families [J]. Security Journal, 2014, 27: 36-54.
[4] ELLEBRACHT E R. Elder Fraud in Colorado: Health Care Provider Understanding and Perceptions of Requirements and Preparation for Mandatory Reporting [D]; University of Arizona Global Campus, 2022.
[5] ANGGRIAWAN R, SUSILA M E, SUNG M H, et al. The Rising Tide of Financial Crime: A Ponzi Scheme Case Analysis [J]. Lex Scientia Law Review, 2023, 7(1): 307-46.
[6] RYZHKOVA M, KASHAPOVA E. Stability of the Ponzi scheme phenomenon [J]. Terra Economicus, 2022, 20(3): 22-38.
[7] GHANI M T A, HALIM B A, RAHMAN S A A, et al. Overconfidence bias among investors: A qualitative evidence from ponzi scheme case study [J]. Corporate and Business Strategy Review, 2023, 4(2): 59-75.
[8] REMEIKIENĖ R, GASPARENIENE L. Effects on the Economic and Sustainable Development and on the Poverty and Social Inequality [M]. Economic and Financial Crime, Sustainability and Good Governance. Springer. 2023: 205-34.
[9] CLARK D, KENT A, LACHAPELLE P, et al. Montana Local Government Board Handbook [J].
[10] VAN EYDEN R J. Badass Trader: How to trade your way to riches [M]. Penguin Random House South Africa, 2023.
[11] DIAMANTIS M E, THOMAS W R. But We Haven't Got Corporate Criminal Law! [J]. J Corp L, 2021, 47: 991.
[12] BARTOLETTI M, CARTA S, CIMOLI T, et al. Dissecting Ponzi schemes on Ethereum: identification, analysis, and impact [J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2020, 102: 259-77.
[13] CHEN W, LI X, SUI Y, et al. Sadponzi: Detecting and characterizing ponzi schemes in ethereum smart contracts [J]. Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, 2021, 5(2): 1-30.
[14] Kuanaliyeva G, Nurgalym D. Crime And Criminal Offense: Similarities And Differences [J]. Қазақстандық Халықаралық Құқық Журналы Казахстанский Журнал Международного Права Kazakhstan Journal Of International Law: 97.
[15] BEDNARCZYK M. Money Laundering [J]. Am Crim L Rev, 2022, 59: 1129.
[16] BARAK G, LEIGHTON P, COTTON A, et al. Class, race, gender, and crime: The social realities of justice in America [M]. Rowman & Littlefield, 2024.
[17] BRANCALE J N, BLOMBERG T G. Criminalizing Abuse, Neglect, and Financial Exploitation of Older Adults [J]. Laws, 2024, 13(4): 49.
[18] QC T H. A judge’s perspective of the impact of the Fraud Act 2006 [M]. Financial Crime and Corporate Misconduct. Routledge. 2018: 144-58.
[19] BEAIRD M. Restoring Broken Trust: A Relationship’S Greatest Challenge [M]. iUniverse, 2013.
[20] BOGLE J C. Common sense on mutual funds: New imperatives for the intelligent investor [M]. John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
[21] TSANG C-Y. The Seven Deadly Sins of the Contemporary Financial System [J]. Rev Banking & Fin L, 2017, 37: 359.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Global Economics and Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
